Did the USA melt Japanese babies and turn teenagers to ashes with its atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

yesDid the USA melt Japanese babies and turn teenagers to ashes with its atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
Most likely, any bomb is capable of horrendous results and I'm sure atomic bombs even more so. But considering the alternative plan involving the invasion of Japan in comparison it was far more humane.


Lets not forget that the Hirohito and all his leadership (political and military) thought it best to align themselves with men named Adolf Hitler and Benito Mousilini. Ask Chinese geriatrics ( 70-90 ) that were around during the Japanese occupation if the Japanese were concerned with Chinese women, babies, or teens. The Philippinos, the Malay, the Indonesians, I could go on all day.War is disguisting, but the true atrocity lays not with war itself, but rather the true atrocity is two part; ever declaring it in the first place and that fact that old men in suits play chess with young men in uniforms and their fellow countrymen as pawns.Did the USA melt Japanese babies and turn teenagers to ashes with its atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
Well yes, since nuclear bombs actually do that. The problem is, this was a time of war, and the US was thoroughly pissed off when Japan went in and attacked Pearl Harbor. If you didnt know, they also took prisoners in Pearl Harbor. They held them in a camp (Kind of like a death camp) and they stripped you naked and searched you. If you had any item that belonged to a Japanese Soldier, you were shot immediatly. If you had something that belonged to a Japanese officer or someone of higher rank, you were wrapped in barbed wire, and dragged around the camp until dead. Dragged around as in hooked onto a leach and dragged, not on your feet by the way, you were kind of laying down and being dragged. This is the kind of thing that said ';We dont care what you do, we'll kill your people.'; Obviously US could not let that stand. Sure, teenages and babies and men and women all were dying because of the atomic bombs, but this was in fact a time of war. If this was not done, then Japan would never quit, and would grow stronger.





Also it should be known that the US actually warned Japan (The Leader of Japan) that if they continued to be aggressive, the US would be forced to take drastic measures. Truman mentioned the bombs and their danger, but Japan's leader called the bluff, saying that we were lying. Of course, we warned them so we dropped the bomb on Hiroshima. Also, it should be known that we warned them again that if they continued to be aggressive we'd drop another bomb. Truman said that he ';had a factory of the stuff waiting'; but the leader of japan, thinking that you could only have one of such a powerful weapon, didnt believe him. Thus the dropping of the bomb on Nagasaki. At that point Japan surrendered.





I realize I may have derailed, but all this was crucial to explaining the answer. Yes, we melted babies and teenagers, but it was war.
Unfortunately, yes.





The alternative, to subdue Japan by conventional means, would almost certainly have led to many more, equally distressing, casualties.





The Japanese had only to submit, and it would never have happened. That they deliberately failed to submit after the first bomb defies credulity. It took two to convince them.





Slow learners.
Boy do you use inflammatory language? It clearly shows it is an agenda driven question. War has always been H_ll. Peace on earth is a fantasy, where there is no recognition of Humans' history. Maybe in the Garden of Eden there wasn't politics going on. but I doubt it. Individuals have always wanted to be the person on top. Being the person adored is always more fun than just being one in the crowd.





These 2 dropping of the bombs most likely saved more lives on both sides than not using them. The ones that died quickly suffered very little. Unfortunately many died painfully of radiation.





Obama's bad mouthing the pre Obama U.S. hasn't gotten the world a safer planet. His cap on CO2 will not change Global warming, but could kill a teetering 1st world economy.
Probably, but we have no apologies to make and I am still glad so few lives were sacrificed in these bombings to save thousands more--American and Japanese lives. Anyone who thinks that isn't so, knows nothing about what happened.
did japan engage in war crimes, the rape of nanking, the battan death march, the asian holocaust? ......look it up on wikipedia....they killed more people than our a bombs could reach......history does have two sides to the story.
Yes, and it was 100 times worse than what Al-Qaeda did to USA 8 years ago. So who are the real terrorists?
Yes and not soon enough, in fact we should have continued with Tokyo.
Yes we did. And it saved an estimated 250,000 to 1,000,000 lives according to President Truman.
If the Japanese never paid a visit to Pearl Harbor, it wouldn't have happened.
Yep. It's sad and unfortunate but it showed the world that were sick of the bullcrap.
Yes, that happened. And it was necessary.
why was Japan allied with Germany?
And how any Kamikaze pilots attacked U.S Warships causing thousands of Americans to be sent home in flags?
YEs





it was AWESOME





you should have seen it!
No, that is a lie, babies cannot be melted.